John Barth and Lost in the Funhouse
Partager
I. John Barth's Thought and Style
The American novelist and short story writer John Barth stands as one of the most influential figures in post–World War II American literature. Emerging prominently in the 1960s, Barth became associated with literary postmodernism, a movement characterized by formal experimentation, narrative self-awareness, and playful engagement with literary tradition. His works challenge conventional storytelling by blending philosophical reflection, metafictional techniques, and intricate narrative structures. Rather than abandoning tradition, Barth reinterprets and revitalizes it through irony, parody, and narrative innovation. His literary thought centers on the possibilities and limitations of fiction in a world saturated with existing narratives, while his stylistic approach reflects a deep fascination with storytelling itself as both subject and method.
Understanding Barth’s literary thought and style requires examining his reflections on narrative exhaustion, his use of metafiction, his playful relationship with literary history, and his commitment to imaginative complexity. Through these elements, Barth contributed decisively to shaping the intellectual and artistic direction of late twentieth-century American fiction.
The Concept of the “Literature of Exhaustion”
A Crisis of Literary Possibility
One of Barth’s most influential contributions to literary thought appears in his 1967 essay “The Literature of Exhaustion.” In this essay, Barth argues that many traditional literary forms had reached a point of artistic saturation. According to him, centuries of storytelling had already explored most narrative possibilities, making it increasingly difficult for modern writers to create entirely original works within established conventions.
However, Barth did not see this exhaustion as the end of literature. Instead, he viewed it as an opportunity for innovation. Writers could respond creatively to the awareness that literature has a history and that modern authors inevitably write in the shadow of earlier works. Rather than pretending that literary traditions do not exist, Barth encouraged writers to acknowledge and incorporate them into their fiction.
Exhaustion as Creative Opportunity
Barth’s concept of exhaustion ultimately became a theoretical foundation for postmodern literature. Instead of striving for pure originality, writers could transform existing forms through parody, intertextuality, and structural experimentation. By recognizing that stories are built upon previous stories, literature could evolve through self-conscious reflection.
This idea deeply shaped Barth’s own fiction. His novels often explore storytelling as a process that is aware of its own limitations and traditions. The result is literature that both celebrates and critiques the history of narrative art.
Metafiction and Self-Reflexive Narrative
Fiction About Fiction
A defining feature of Barth’s literary style is metafiction, a narrative technique in which a story reflects upon its own status as a fictional construction. In Barth’s works, narrators frequently acknowledge the act of storytelling, discuss narrative conventions, or question the relationship between fiction and reality.
This self-reflexive quality appears vividly in works such as Lost in the Funhouse (1968). In this collection, the stories often interrupt themselves to comment on literary techniques, narrative structure, or the expectations of readers. By exposing the mechanisms of storytelling, Barth transforms fiction into a reflection on its own creation.
The Role of the Reader
Metafiction in Barth’s work also changes the role of the reader. Instead of passively receiving a story, the reader becomes an active participant in interpreting narrative strategies and recognizing literary references. Barth’s texts invite readers to become aware of the constructed nature of fiction, encouraging them to engage critically with the storytelling process.
This emphasis on reader awareness reflects Barth’s broader intellectual project: to explore how stories are formed, understood, and reshaped through cultural and literary traditions.
Playfulness and Narrative Experimentation
Structural Innovation
Barth’s fiction is notable for its complex narrative structures. Many of his works employ unconventional forms, layered narratives, and elaborate framing devices. In novels such as The Sot-Weed Factor (1960) and Giles Goat-Boy (1966), Barth constructs vast fictional worlds that combine satire, historical parody, and philosophical reflection.
These works often imitate earlier literary styles while simultaneously transforming them. For instance, The Sot-Weed Factor draws upon the structure of eighteenth-century picaresque novels while exaggerating their conventions to create both homage and satire. Through such stylistic playfulness, Barth explores how literary traditions can be reimagined rather than simply repeated.
Humor and Irony
Another key element of Barth’s style is humor. His works frequently employ comic exaggeration, absurd situations, and ironic commentary. Humor allows Barth to question philosophical ideas, literary conventions, and cultural assumptions without abandoning intellectual seriousness.
The playful tone of his fiction reflects a broader postmodern sensibility. Rather than presenting a single authoritative meaning, Barth’s narratives often embrace ambiguity, multiplicity, and open-ended interpretation. Humor becomes a method for exploring complexity rather than resolving it.
Intertextuality and Literary Tradition
Dialogue with the Past
Barth’s literary thought is deeply rooted in dialogue with earlier literary traditions. His works frequently reference, imitate, or reinterpret classical texts and narrative forms. This intertextual approach reflects his belief that literature is a continuous conversation across generations.
Instead of rejecting tradition, Barth reworks it creatively. His novels often incorporate elements of myth, classical storytelling, and earlier literary genres. By doing so, he demonstrates that modern fiction can remain connected to historical forms while still pursuing innovation.
Reinventing Narrative Heritage
Through parody and reinterpretation, Barth transforms literary history into a source of artistic renewal. Traditional narrative forms—such as the picaresque novel, epic myth, and allegorical narrative—are reimagined within contemporary contexts. This blending of old and new illustrates Barth’s conviction that the vitality of literature lies not in abandoning tradition but in reexamining it from new perspectives.
Philosophical Dimensions of Barth’s Fiction
Storytelling as Human Necessity
Beyond formal experimentation, Barth’s work explores deeper philosophical questions about the role of storytelling in human life. His fiction often suggests that narratives are essential for making sense of experience. Stories provide structure, meaning, and coherence in a world that might otherwise appear chaotic.
For Barth, storytelling is not merely entertainment but a fundamental aspect of human culture. The act of telling stories becomes a way of organizing knowledge, transmitting values, and constructing identity.
The Paradox of Narrative Meaning
At the same time, Barth acknowledges the paradoxical nature of storytelling. If every story echoes earlier stories, can literature still create something new? Barth’s answer lies in transformation rather than originality. By reworking existing narratives through new forms and perspectives, writers can produce works that are both familiar and innovative.
This philosophical tension between tradition and innovation lies at the heart of Barth’s literary vision.
II. Lost in the Funhouse Setting and Plot
Lost in the Funhouse (1968) by John Barth is one of the most distinctive works of postmodern American fiction. Rather than presenting a conventional narrative structure, the book is a collection of interconnected short stories that experiment with storytelling itself. The most famous piece in the collection, also titled “Lost in the Funhouse,” follows a young boy named Ambrose as he travels with his family to an amusement park in Ocean City, Maryland. While the external plot appears relatively simple, the story unfolds through layers of narrative commentary, stylistic experimentation, and metafictional reflection.
The plot of Lost in the Funhouse therefore operates on two levels. On the surface, it tells the story of a boy’s childhood experience and emotional confusion during a family outing. On a deeper level, it explores the process of storytelling, the construction of narrative form, and the psychological complexities of growing up. The setting, particularly the funhouse itself, becomes both a literal location and a symbolic space that reflects Ambrose’s inner world and the labyrinthine nature of narrative.
Narrative Framework of the Collection
Stories Connected by Theme and Experimentation
The collection Lost in the Funhouse consists of several stories that vary widely in narrative form. Some imitate classical storytelling traditions, while others break conventional structures entirely. Many of the stories focus on mythological or allegorical subjects, including reinterpretations of classical myths such as the tale of Perseus.
Despite their diversity, the stories are united by Barth’s interest in the nature of narrative and the experience of self-conscious storytelling. The title story serves as the emotional and thematic center of the collection, combining autobiographical elements with experimental narrative techniques.
The Central Story of Ambrose
The narrative of “Lost in the Funhouse” follows Ambrose Mensch, a sensitive and self-aware adolescent. Ambrose travels with his family—his parents, his brother Peter, and a young girl named Magda—to Ocean City during a Fourth of July vacation. The story describes their journey, their arrival at the seaside resort, and their visit to the amusement park funhouse.
Although the external events are relatively modest, the narrative focuses intensely on Ambrose’s inner thoughts, insecurities, and emerging awareness of adult relationships.
The Plot of “Lost in the Funhouse”
The Family Journey to Ocean City
The story begins with Ambrose’s family driving toward Ocean City, Maryland, a popular vacation destination along the Atlantic coast. The drive introduces the central characters and establishes Ambrose’s reflective personality. During the trip, Ambrose observes the interactions between his older brother Peter and Magda, who appear increasingly attracted to each other.
Ambrose becomes acutely aware of his own awkwardness and emotional uncertainty. His developing self-consciousness marks the beginning of the story’s central psychological conflict.
Ambrose’s Inner Conflict
As the family spends time at the beach and the amusement park, Ambrose becomes increasingly preoccupied with questions about identity, sexuality, and belonging. He observes Peter’s apparent confidence and his growing relationship with Magda, which intensifies Ambrose’s feelings of insecurity and exclusion.
Throughout the narrative, Ambrose imagines how others perceive him and wonders whether he will ever understand how to behave in social situations. These reflections reveal the psychological turbulence associated with adolescence and the transition from childhood to adulthood.
The Experience of the Funhouse
The climax of the story occurs when the group enters the amusement park funhouse. Inside this maze of mirrors, twisting corridors, and confusing passageways, Ambrose becomes separated from the others. The physical environment of the funhouse mirrors his emotional state—disorienting, uncertain, and filled with reflections that distort reality.
As Ambrose wanders through the labyrinth, he becomes both physically and psychologically lost. The story ends ambiguously, suggesting that Ambrose may remain trapped within the funhouse, both literally and metaphorically.
The Setting of Ocean City
A Realistic American Seaside Town
Ocean City, Maryland serves as the primary setting of the story. During the mid-twentieth century, Ocean City was a popular vacation destination known for its beaches, boardwalk, and amusement attractions. Barth uses this recognizable setting to ground the narrative in everyday American life.
The seaside environment evokes the atmosphere of summer holidays, family gatherings, and youthful adventure. At the same time, the setting reflects the cultural landscape of mid-century America, where leisure and entertainment formed a central part of social life.
The Boardwalk and Amusement Park
The boardwalk and amusement park play an important role in shaping the story’s atmosphere. These spaces represent excitement, novelty, and spectacle. The amusement park is filled with mechanical rides, bright lights, and playful distractions that capture the imagination of visitors.
For Ambrose, however, the amusement park also becomes a place of anxiety and confusion. The lively environment contrasts with his internal sense of isolation and uncertainty.
The Symbolism of the Funhouse
A Labyrinth of Mirrors
The funhouse itself is the most significant setting in the story. Traditionally designed as a playful attraction, a funhouse contains mirrors, rotating tunnels, dark corridors, and unexpected turns intended to confuse visitors for amusement.
In Barth’s story, this environment becomes a powerful metaphor. The maze-like structure reflects Ambrose’s psychological confusion and his struggle to understand himself and others. The distorted mirrors symbolize the difficulty of forming a stable identity during adolescence.
A Metaphor for Storytelling
The funhouse also symbolizes the nature of narrative in Barth’s fiction. Just as the funhouse contains multiple pathways, reflections, and illusions, the story itself is filled with narrative digressions, commentary on literary techniques, and interruptions that disrupt the flow of the plot.
This structural complexity turns the story into a kind of literary funhouse. Readers move through passages of narrative, commentary, and reflection much as visitors navigate the twisting corridors of the amusement attraction.
The Relationship Between Plot and Setting
Psychological Landscape
In Lost in the Funhouse, the physical setting is closely tied to the psychological development of the protagonist. Ocean City represents the ordinary world of childhood experiences, family vacations, and social interaction. The funhouse, however, represents the deeper emotional and intellectual struggles that Ambrose faces as he becomes aware of adulthood.
The transition from the open spaces of the beach to the enclosed maze of the funhouse parallels Ambrose’s movement from external observation to internal reflection.
The Setting as Narrative Structure
Barth’s use of setting also reflects his experimental narrative style. The labyrinthine design of the funhouse resembles the structure of the story itself, which moves unpredictably between plot, commentary, and technical explanations of narrative devices.
By aligning the physical environment with the form of the narrative, Barth creates a unified artistic design in which content and structure reinforce one another.
III. Lost in the Funhouse's Main Themes
John Barth’s Lost in the Funhouse is widely regarded as one of the most significant works of postmodern American fiction. While the narrative centers on the adolescent experience of a young boy named Ambrose, the story operates on several intellectual and philosophical levels. Beneath its seemingly simple account of a family trip to an amusement park lies a complex exploration of identity, storytelling, self-consciousness, and the changing nature of literature itself. Barth constructs the narrative so that its themes emerge simultaneously through plot, symbolism, and stylistic experimentation.
The themes of Lost in the Funhouse reflect both personal and literary concerns. On the one hand, the story examines the psychological confusion of adolescence, the painful awareness of self, and the search for identity. On the other hand, it raises broader questions about narrative form, the limits of originality in literature, and the relationship between fiction and reality. Together, these themes reveal Barth’s deeper reflection on the nature of storytelling in the modern world.
The Crisis of Identity and Adolescence
The Psychological Experience of Growing Up
One of the central themes of Lost in the Funhouse is the emotional complexity of adolescence. The protagonist, Ambrose, experiences the intense self-consciousness that often accompanies the transition from childhood to adulthood. Throughout the story, he becomes painfully aware of how others might perceive him, especially when comparing himself to his older brother Peter.
Ambrose’s thoughts constantly return to questions about his appearance, behavior, and social competence. These concerns reveal the instability of identity during adolescence. Rather than feeling confident about who he is, Ambrose experiences uncertainty and insecurity, which shape his interactions with others.
Social Awareness and Emotional Isolation
The theme of adolescence is also connected to feelings of isolation. Ambrose observes the growing romantic connection between Peter and Magda, and this observation intensifies his sense of exclusion. While he longs to participate in the social and emotional world of adults, he feels unable to understand or join it.
This emotional distance creates a profound sense of loneliness. Ambrose’s internal reflections highlight the psychological tension between the desire for connection and the fear of inadequacy.
Self-Consciousness and the Burden of Awareness
Excessive Self-Awareness
Another major theme in Lost in the Funhouse is the burden of excessive self-awareness. Ambrose does not simply experience events; he constantly analyzes them. He worries about how stories are told, how people behave, and how he himself might appear to others.
This constant self-examination prevents him from enjoying ordinary experiences. Instead of participating naturally in the events around him, he observes himself almost as if he were a character in a story. This distance between experience and reflection becomes one of the defining features of his personality.
The Paralysis of Reflection
Barth suggests that excessive self-awareness can lead to emotional paralysis. Because Ambrose thinks so intensely about his actions and identity, he struggles to act spontaneously. The more he reflects, the more uncertain he becomes.
This theme resonates with broader intellectual concerns of the twentieth century, where heightened self-consciousness often produced anxiety rather than clarity. In Ambrose’s case, awareness does not lead to confidence but instead deepens his confusion about how to live.
The Nature of Storytelling
Fiction as a Self-Aware Process
Perhaps the most distinctive theme in Lost in the Funhouse is the exploration of storytelling itself. Throughout the narrative, the text interrupts the plot to comment on narrative techniques, literary conventions, and the mechanics of fiction. These moments remind readers that the story is an artificial construction rather than a transparent representation of reality.
By drawing attention to the process of storytelling, Barth transforms the narrative into a reflection on literature. The story does not merely present events; it constantly examines how those events are being narrated.
The Limits of Narrative Originality
Closely related to this theme is Barth’s concern about the limits of originality in literature. The story reflects a broader postmodern awareness that writers inherit a long tradition of narrative forms. Because so many stories have already been told, modern writers often feel constrained by existing conventions.
Barth addresses this problem by incorporating those conventions into the narrative itself. Rather than hiding the influence of literary tradition, the story openly acknowledges and plays with it.
The Symbolism of the Funhouse
The Funhouse as a Psychological Maze
The funhouse represents one of the most powerful symbols in the story. As a physical space filled with mirrors, twisting corridors, and confusing pathways, it mirrors Ambrose’s internal state. The labyrinthine structure reflects his emotional uncertainty and his inability to find a clear sense of direction.
Just as visitors in a funhouse struggle to find the correct path, Ambrose struggles to navigate the complexities of identity, relationships, and self-understanding.
Illusion and Distortion
The distorted mirrors inside the funhouse also symbolize the instability of perception. Reflections appear exaggerated, fragmented, or transformed, making it difficult to recognize what is real.
This imagery reflects the broader theme of uncertainty in both identity and narrative. Just as mirrors distort physical appearance, stories can reshape reality through interpretation and representation.
Isolation and the Search for Meaning
Emotional Separation from Others
Another recurring theme in the story is the difficulty of human connection. Ambrose’s observations of Peter and Magda highlight his sense of emotional distance from others. Although he longs for companionship and understanding, he often feels disconnected from the people around him.
This isolation intensifies during the final moments of the story when he becomes lost in the funhouse. The physical separation from others reinforces the emotional distance he has experienced throughout the narrative.
The Uncertain Ending
The story’s ambiguous ending deepens this theme of isolation. It remains unclear whether Ambrose will find his way out of the funhouse or remain trapped within it. This uncertainty reflects the unresolved nature of his personal struggles.
Barth avoids providing a clear resolution, emphasizing instead the ongoing process of searching for meaning and identity.
Literature, Tradition, and Postmodern Reflection
A Dialogue with Literary History
Lost in the Funhouse also reflects Barth’s broader engagement with literary history. The story acknowledges that literature is shaped by traditions that influence how narratives are written and understood.
Rather than rejecting these traditions, Barth transforms them into material for experimentation. By combining traditional narrative elements with self-reflexive commentary, he creates a work that simultaneously belongs to and questions literary history.
The Postmodern Condition
In many ways, the themes of the story embody the intellectual climate of postmodernism. The narrative challenges the idea of stable meaning, questions the reliability of storytelling, and highlights the constructed nature of literary form.
These concerns place Barth among the writers who redefined fiction during the late twentieth century, emphasizing complexity, ambiguity, and self-awareness.
IV. The Style of Lost in the Funhouse
John Barth’s Lost in the Funhouse represents one of the most distinctive stylistic achievements in postmodern American fiction. Rather than adhering to conventional narrative techniques, Barth constructs a text that deliberately draws attention to its own artificiality and structure. The story does not merely recount events; it continually reflects upon how stories are written, organized, and interpreted. Through this experimental approach, Barth challenges traditional expectations of narrative coherence and invites readers to reconsider the nature of fiction itself.
The stylistic approach of Lost in the Funhouse combines metafiction, narrative fragmentation, technical commentary, intertextual play, and symbolic structural design. These elements create a work in which form and meaning are inseparable. The style itself becomes part of the story’s subject, illustrating Barth’s belief that modern literature must acknowledge its own history and limitations while seeking new artistic possibilities.
Metafiction and Narrative Self-Awareness
Fiction That Reflects on Itself
One of the most important stylistic features of Lost in the Funhouse is its use of metafiction. Metafiction refers to a narrative technique in which a work of fiction draws attention to its own status as a constructed text. Instead of presenting the story as a seamless illusion of reality, Barth constantly reminds readers that they are reading a carefully crafted narrative.
Throughout the story, the narrator interrupts the plot to explain literary devices such as point of view, narrative pacing, or the function of dialogue. These explanations disrupt the illusion of realism and encourage readers to observe the mechanics of storytelling.
The Narrator as a Critical Voice
The narrator frequently adopts the tone of a literary instructor, describing how certain narrative techniques work or how particular sentences could be structured more effectively. This unusual narrative voice transforms the story into both a fictional narrative and a commentary on narrative craft.
By merging storytelling with literary analysis, Barth blurs the boundary between creative writing and critical reflection. The reader experiences the story while simultaneously observing the process by which it is constructed.
Fragmentation and Disrupted Narrative Flow
Breaking the Continuity of Plot
Another defining aspect of Barth’s stylistic approach is the deliberate fragmentation of narrative continuity. In traditional fiction, events unfold in a relatively smooth and coherent sequence. In Lost in the Funhouse, however, the narrative frequently pauses or shifts direction.
Technical discussions about narrative technique interrupt the story at unexpected moments. These interruptions create a sense of fragmentation that prevents the reader from becoming completely absorbed in the fictional world.
Reflecting the Protagonist’s Psychological State
This fragmented style mirrors the psychological condition of the protagonist, Ambrose. His thoughts are scattered, self-conscious, and often uncertain. The narrative structure reflects this mental state by moving unpredictably between description, reflection, and commentary.
The stylistic fragmentation therefore serves a thematic purpose. The disrupted narrative flow parallels Ambrose’s internal confusion and his struggle to understand himself and the world around him.
Playful Experimentation with Narrative Form
Innovation and Literary Play
Barth’s style is characterized by an intellectual playfulness that challenges traditional literary conventions. He treats narrative form as something flexible and open to experimentation rather than as a rigid structure that must be preserved.
This playful experimentation appears in the story’s shifting tone and unconventional organization. At times the narrative resembles a conventional coming-of-age story, while at other moments it resembles an essay on literary technique.
Challenging Reader Expectations
Because the story repeatedly disrupts narrative expectations, readers must constantly adjust their approach to the text. Instead of passively following a sequence of events, they are encouraged to reflect on the nature of storytelling itself.
This stylistic strategy transforms reading into an active process. The reader becomes aware not only of what the story describes but also of how stories function as artistic constructions.
Intertextuality and Literary Tradition
Engagement with Earlier Narrative Forms
Barth’s stylistic approach also reflects a deep awareness of literary tradition. His work often incorporates elements drawn from earlier narrative forms, including classical myths, allegories, and traditional storytelling techniques.
In Lost in the Funhouse, references to narrative conventions appear alongside commentary on their limitations. Barth demonstrates how contemporary writers must engage with the long history of literature that precedes them.
Tradition as Material for Experimentation
Rather than rejecting literary tradition, Barth treats it as material for creative transformation. By openly acknowledging narrative conventions, he reveals how modern fiction can reinterpret and reshape them.
This intertextual style reinforces Barth’s belief that literature evolves through dialogue with its past rather than through complete separation from it.
Symbolic Structure and the Funhouse Metaphor
Narrative as Labyrinth
The stylistic design of the story parallels the physical structure of the funhouse itself. Just as the funhouse contains twisting corridors, mirrors, and unexpected turns, the narrative contains digressions, reflections, and interruptions.
Readers move through the story much like visitors move through the amusement attraction. The path is rarely straightforward, and moments of confusion are part of the experience.
Form Reflecting Content
This structural parallel between the narrative and the funhouse represents one of Barth’s most sophisticated stylistic achievements. The form of the story reflects its central metaphor. The reader becomes metaphorically lost in the narrative just as Ambrose becomes lost in the funhouse.
By aligning structure and symbolism, Barth demonstrates how literary form can reinforce thematic meaning.
Humor, Irony, and Intellectual Playfulness
The Comic Dimension of Barth’s Style
Despite its intellectual complexity, Barth’s writing is often infused with humor and irony. The narrator’s explanations of narrative techniques sometimes appear exaggerated or intentionally awkward, creating a playful tone.
This humor prevents the story from becoming overly abstract or theoretical. Instead, the narrative balances serious reflection with a sense of comic experimentation.
Irony and Distance
Irony also allows Barth to maintain a distance from traditional narrative expectations. The story simultaneously participates in and critiques the conventions of storytelling.
Through irony, Barth encourages readers to question assumptions about what fiction should be and how narratives create meaning.
Works Cited
Barth, John. The Floating Opera. Doubleday, 1956.
Barth, John. The End of the Road. Doubleday, 1958.
Barth, John. The Sot-Weed Factor. Doubleday, 1960.
Barth, John. Giles Goat-Boy. Doubleday, 1966.
Barth, John. “The Literature of Exhaustion.” The Atlantic Monthly, Aug. 1967.
Barth, John. Lost in the Funhouse: Fiction for Print, Tape, Live Voice. Doubleday, 1968.
Barth, John. Chimera. Random House, 1972.
Barth, John. LETTERS. G. P. Putnam’s Sons, 1979.
Barth, John. The Friday Book: Essays and Other Nonfiction. Johns Hopkins UP, 1984.
Barth, John. Further Fridays: Essays, Lectures, and Other Nonfiction, 1984–1994. Little, Brown, 1995.
Barth, John. The Book of Ten Nights and a Night. Little, Brown, 2004.
Bell, Vereen M. The Achievement of John Barth. Louisiana State UP, 1983.
Bowen, Zack. A Reader’s Guide to John Barth. Greenwood Press, 1994.
Federman, Raymond, and John Barth, editors. Surfiction: Fiction Now and Tomorrow. Swallow Press, 1975.
Harris, Charles B. Passionate Virtuosity: The Fiction of John Barth. University of Illinois Press, 1983.
Hinden, Michael. “Lost in the Funhouse and the Art of Self-Reflexive Fiction.” In Waldmeir, pp. 190–200.
Morrell, David. John Barth: An Introduction. Pennsylvania State UP, 1976.
Olster, Stacey. Reminiscence and Re-Creation in Contemporary American Fiction. Cambridge UP, 1989.
Simon, Bart. Critical Essays on John Barth. G. K. Hall, 1980.
Waldmeir, Joseph J., editor. Critical Essays on John Barth. G. K. Hall, 1980.
Zamora, Lois Parkinson. Writing the Apocalypse: Historical Vision in Contemporary U.S. and Latin American Fiction. Cambridge UP, 1989.