1. Written During the Reign of King James I (1603–1625)

Macbeth was most likely written and first performed around 1606, only a few years after James VI of Scotland became James I of England. Shakespeare’s company, The King’s Men, performed under the patronage of this new monarch, so the play was carefully designed to appeal to King James and his interests. The play’s setting in Scotland, its themes of royal legitimacy, and its warning against treason would all have flattered the new king, who was deeply concerned with securing his rule after Queen Elizabeth I’s death and the end of the Tudor dynasty.

---

🧙♀️ 2. The Influence of Witchcraft and the Supernatural

In the early 1600s, belief in witchcraft was widespread and deeply feared. King James himself had a personal fascination with the subject. Before becoming King of England, he wrote a book titled Daemonologie (1597)*, which argued for the reality of witchcraft and justified the persecution of witches. The inclusion of the Three Witches in Macbeth directly reflects this cultural obsession and plays into contemporary fears about sorcery, prophecy, and moral corruption. By portraying the witches as evil agents who tempt Macbeth to destroy himself, Shakespeare echoes James’s own anti-witchcraft beliefs and the idea that dabbling in dark forces leads to chaos and damnation.

---

👑 3. The Theme of Kingship and Legitimacy

The murder of King Duncan and Macbeth’s usurpation of the throne mirror the political anxieties of Shakespeare’s time. England had just experienced a change in monarchy, and stability was fragile. Shakespeare emphasizes the divine right of kings — the belief that monarchs are chosen by God and must not be overthrown — a concept King James strongly supported. Duncan’s murder is depicted as a cosmic crime that disturbs the natural order: darkness covers the land, animals behave strangely, and moral balance collapses. The play thus reinforces the message that regicide (the killing of a king) leads to chaos and must be punished, aligning with James’s political ideology.

---

🩸 4. The Gunpowder Plot (1605)

Only a year before Macbeth was written, England was shaken by the Gunpowder Plot, an attempted assassination of King James I by a group of Catholic conspirators led by Guy Fawkes. The play’s emphasis on treason, guilt, and divine punishment resonates strongly with this event. Macbeth’s secret plotting against Duncan would have reminded audiences of the real-life betrayal against their king, reinforcing the dangers of political ambition and disloyalty. Shakespeare may have even alluded to this in the imagery of “equivocation” (used by the witches and the Porter in Act II), a term connected to the Jesuit priest Henry Garnet, who was executed for his involvement in the Gunpowder Plot.

---

🏴 5. Scottish History and Holinshed’s Chronicles

Shakespeare drew the historical background for Macbeth from Raphael Holinshed’s Chronicles of England, Scotland, and Ireland (1587). However, he adapted history to fit his dramatic purposes and political message. In the real chronicles, Macbeth reigned for about ten years and was considered a capable ruler before being overthrown by Malcolm. Shakespeare changed the story to make Macbeth’s rule seem short, bloody, and unnatural — reinforcing the moral that ambition and murder lead to destruction. Duncan, portrayed as saintly and innocent in the play, was in reality a younger and perhaps less effective ruler; Shakespeare idealized him to strengthen the contrast between lawful and unlawful kingship.

---

⚖️ 6. Religion, Morality, and the Elizabethan Worldview

Shakespeare wrote Macbeth at a time when Christian moral and cosmic order were central to English thought. The play reflects the Elizabethan belief in the “Great Chain of Being”, the idea that every element of creation has its proper place, from God to kings to commoners. When Macbeth kills Duncan, he breaks this divine hierarchy, and the resulting turmoil — moral, natural, and political — shows the consequences of disrupting God’s order. The emphasis on guilt, conscience, and eternal damnation also reflects Protestant concerns about sin and moral accountability.

---

🌩️ 7. Reflection of Contemporary Fears and Political Lessons

For Shakespeare’s audience, Macbeth was not merely entertainment — it was a moral and political lesson. It dramatized the dangers of ambition, the corruption of power, and the instability that comes from rebellion. By ending with Malcolm’s restoration to the throne, the play offered reassurance that divine justice ultimately prevails and that rightful rule brings peace. This message would have deeply resonated with a nation still recovering from plots, religious divisions, and questions of succession.

Act I: The Seeds of Ambition

Scene 1:
The play opens on a desolate Scottish heath with thunder and lightning. Three witches (the “Weird Sisters”) meet and plan to confront Macbeth after the battle. Their cryptic chant — “Fair is foul, and foul is fair” — sets the tone of moral confusion that runs throughout the play.

Scene 2:
At King Duncan’s camp, a wounded sergeant reports Macbeth’s heroism in battle against Norwegian forces and traitorous rebels. Impressed by Macbeth’s bravery, Duncan rewards him with the title Thane of Cawdor, unaware that the previous thane has been executed for treason.

Scene 3:
On a barren heath, Macbeth and Banquo encounter the witches. They greet Macbeth with three titles: Thane of Glamis (his current title), Thane of Cawdor (his new but as-yet-unknown title), and King hereafter. They also predict that Banquo will father kings though not be one himself. When Ross and Angus arrive to announce Macbeth’s new title, the first part of the prophecy comes true—igniting Macbeth’s ambition.

Scenes 4–7:
Duncan names his son Malcolm heir to the throne, a move that frustrates Macbeth’s ambitions. At Inverness (Scene 5), Lady Macbeth reads her husband’s letter about the witches and vows to push him toward the crown. When Duncan visits their castle (Scene 6), she welcomes him warmly but secretly plans his murder. In Scene 7, Macbeth wrestles with his conscience but is persuaded by Lady Macbeth’s taunts and determination to kill Duncan that night.

---

Act II: The Murder and Its Consequences

Scene 1:
As Macbeth prepares to murder Duncan, he hallucinates a bloody dagger pointing toward the king’s chamber—symbolizing his guilty ambition.

Scene 2:
After murdering Duncan in his sleep, Macbeth is shaken and horrified by his own deed. Lady Macbeth takes control, smearing the grooms with blood to frame them for the murder.

Scene 3:
The Porter’s comic speech provides brief relief before Macduff discovers Duncan’s body. Chaos erupts; Duncan’s sons, Malcolm and Donalbain, flee in fear (to England and Ireland), which makes them appear guilty.

Scene 4:
Macbeth is crowned King of Scotland, fulfilling the witches’ prophecy, but suspicion and unease begin to spread.

---

Act III: The Tyrant’s Reign

Scenes 1–3:
Now king, Macbeth fears Banquo and his descendants, since the witches predicted Banquo’s heirs would inherit the throne. He hires assassins to kill Banquo and his son Fleance. Banquo is murdered, but Fleance escapes, leaving Macbeth haunted by insecurity.

Scene 4:
At a royal banquet, Banquo’s ghost appears to Macbeth alone, terrifying him into public hysteria. Lady Macbeth tries to calm the guests, but Macbeth’s erratic behavior makes his guilt evident.

Scenes 5–6:
The witches meet with Hecate, the goddess of witchcraft, to plan Macbeth’s downfall. Meanwhile, Scottish nobles, including Lennox, begin to doubt Macbeth’s legitimacy, and Macduff flees to England to seek Malcolm’s help in overthrowing the tyrant.

---

Act IV: The Power of Prophecy

Scene 1:
Macbeth visits the witches again. They conjure three apparitions:

1. An armed head warns him to beware Macduff.

2. A bloody child tells him that no one “born of woman” can harm him.

3. A crowned child holding a tree says he will be safe until Birnam Wood comes to Dunsinane Hill.
   Reassured yet still paranoid, Macbeth orders Macduff’s castle attacked and his family murdered.

Scenes 2–3:
In Fife, Lady Macduff and her son are brutally killed. Meanwhile, in England, Malcolm tests Macduff’s loyalty before uniting with him to raise an army against Macbeth. Macduff, learning of his family’s slaughter, vows revenge.

---

Act V: Downfall and Death

Scene 1:
Lady Macbeth, tormented by guilt, sleepwalks through the castle, obsessively rubbing imagined blood from her hands and crying, “Out, damned spot!” Her mental collapse contrasts sharply with her earlier strength.

Scenes 2–5:
Malcolm’s army advances on Dunsinane, disguising themselves with branches from Birnam Wood, thus fulfilling one prophecy. Macbeth prepares for battle, clinging to the witches’ words that no one born of woman can harm him.

Scenes 6–8:
In the final battle, Macbeth fights valiantly but faces Macduff, who reveals he was “from his mother’s womb untimely ripped” — born by Caesarean section, not in the usual way. Macbeth realizes too late that the prophecy has deceived him. Macduff kills him, and Malcolm is proclaimed king, restoring order to Scotland.

 

IV. Main Characters

.

---

👑 Macbeth

Macbeth, the play’s tragic hero, begins as a brave and loyal Scottish general, highly esteemed by King Duncan and admired by his peers for his courage in battle. When the three witches prophesy that he will become king, his latent ambition awakens. Though initially hesitant, he is soon persuaded by Lady Macbeth to murder Duncan and seize the throne. From this point, Macbeth’s character undergoes a profound transformation: he evolves from a man of honor to a paranoid tyrant haunted by guilt and fear.

Shakespeare portrays Macbeth’s downfall as both psychological and moral. His conscience torments him (“Will all great Neptune’s ocean wash this blood clean from my hand?”), yet he becomes increasingly desensitized to violence, ordering more murders to secure his power. The witches’ ambiguous prophecies fuel his overconfidence and lead to his destruction. In the end, Macbeth is both villain and victim — a man destroyed by his ambition, moral weakness, and the seductive power of evil.

---

👑 Lady Macbeth

Lady Macbeth is one of Shakespeare’s most complex female characters. Ambitious and intelligent, she is the driving force behind Duncan’s murder. Upon learning of the witches’ prophecy, she fears her husband is “too full o’ the milk of human kindness” to seize the crown, so she calls upon “spirits” to “unsex” her and fill her with cruelty. She manipulates Macbeth with taunts and questions of his manhood until he agrees to kill Duncan.

However, her apparent strength conceals a fragile conscience. After the murder, she becomes increasingly consumed by guilt and remorse, which manifest in her famous sleepwalking scene (Act V, Scene 1), where she compulsively tries to wash imaginary blood from her hands. Her descent into madness and eventual death (likely suicide) reveal the deep psychological cost of ambition and moral transgression. Lady Macbeth symbolizes the corrupting power of unchecked ambition and the destructive consequences of guilt.

---

⚔️ Banquo

Banquo, Macbeth’s friend and fellow general, serves as a foil to Macbeth. Both men receive prophecies from the witches, but while Macbeth acts upon them with reckless ambition, Banquo chooses restraint and moral integrity. The witches predict that Banquo “shalt get kings, though thou be none,” meaning his descendants will inherit the throne. Macbeth, fearing this prophecy, arranges Banquo’s murder.

After his death, Banquo’s ghost appears at the royal banquet (Act III, Scene 4), symbolizing Macbeth’s haunted conscience and moral decay. Banquo’s honesty and loyalty contrast sharply with Macbeth’s treachery. Through Banquo, Shakespeare explores how individuals respond differently to temptation and ambition — one resisting evil, the other succumbing to it.

---

⚖️ Macduff

Macduff, the Thane of Fife, emerges as Macbeth’s moral and political opposite. Loyal to Scotland and outraged by Duncan’s murder, he flees to England to join Malcolm in restoring rightful rule. His deep sense of honor and justice is balanced by human emotion; his grief upon learning of the slaughter of his family (Act IV, Scene 3) shows his humanity and strengthens his resolve for revenge.

In the final act, Macduff kills Macbeth in single combat, fulfilling the prophecy that no man “born of woman” could harm Macbeth — since Macduff was delivered by Caesarean birth. He thus becomes the instrument of divine justice, restoring moral order to Scotland. Macduff represents loyalty, courage, and righteousness, standing as a symbol of moral integrity against tyranny.

---

👑 King Duncan

King Duncan embodies benevolent kingship and political order. He is kind, trusting, and generous, rewarding his subjects for loyalty. His murder is presented as a sacrilegious act that disrupts both human and natural order. Duncan’s virtuous leadership contrasts with Macbeth’s corrupt rule, reinforcing the play’s central theme that legitimate authority is sacred, and its violation brings chaos.

---

🧙♀️ The Three Witches (The Weird Sisters)

The witches are mysterious, supernatural figures whose prophecies ignite Macbeth’s ambition and shape the play’s events. They symbolize fate, chaos, and moral corruption, but their role is deliberately ambiguous — they never force Macbeth to act, only tempt him by revealing half-truths. Their famous paradox, “Fair is foul, and foul is fair,” captures the play’s atmosphere of moral confusion and deception.

Some critics interpret them as representations of Macbeth’s inner desires, while others see them as agents of evil influencing human destiny. In either case, they embody the unsettling idea that evil can manipulate human weakness through temptation and half-truths.

---

👑 Malcolm

Malcolm, King Duncan’s eldest son, represents legitimate succession and moral restoration. After his father’s murder, he prudently flees to England to avoid being killed himself. In exile, he matures as a leader and tests Macduff’s loyalty before joining him to overthrow Macbeth. By the end of the play, Malcolm’s coronation signifies the return of order, justice, and rightful kingship. His calm wisdom and sense of duty contrast with Macbeth’s reckless ambition.

 

V. Major Themes

⚔️ 1. Ambition and the Corrupting Power of Power

The central theme of Macbeth is ambition—specifically, how unchecked ambition can destroy both the individual and the moral order. Macbeth begins as a brave and loyal soldier, but once the witches plant the idea of kingship in his mind, ambition consumes him. Encouraged by Lady Macbeth, he murders Duncan and sets himself on a path of tyranny, paranoia, and ruin.
Shakespeare shows that ambition itself is not inherently evil; it becomes destructive when it overpowers conscience and loyalty. Macbeth’s moral decline—from hesitation to ruthless violence—illustrates how the desire for power corrupts the soul, transforming a hero into a murderer and ultimately a mad tyrant.

---

🩸 2. Guilt and Conscience

After the murder of Duncan, both Macbeth and Lady Macbeth are plagued by guilt. Macbeth hears imaginary voices crying “Sleep no more!” while Lady Macbeth obsessively washes her hands, crying, “Out, damned spot!” Guilt in Macbeth is not merely emotional but also psychological and spiritual punishment.
Shakespeare portrays guilt as an inevitable consequence of moral violation: no matter how much power the characters gain, they cannot escape their conscience. This theme underscores the idea that moral order always reasserts itself, even when human law is silent.

---

🌩️ 3. Fate vs. Free Will

The witches’ prophecies introduce the question of fate and free will: are Macbeth’s actions predestined, or does he choose his own path? While the witches predict that he will become king, they never tell him to commit murder. Macbeth acts on their words, revealing that his downfall stems not from fate but from his own choices.
Shakespeare’s ambiguity invites audiences to reflect on the tension between destiny and human responsibility—a question that continues to resonate. Macbeth seeks to control fate by murdering Banquo and his son, but in doing so, he fulfills the very prophecies he fears.

---

👁️ 4. Appearance vs. Reality

“Fair is foul, and foul is fair” — the witches’ chant — establishes one of the play’s most pervasive themes: the blurring of appearance and reality. Characters and situations in Macbeth are rarely what they seem. Duncan’s trust in Macbeth leads to his death; Lady Macbeth hides her guilt behind a mask of calm; and the witches’ prophecies use double meanings to deceive.
This theme exposes the moral confusion in the world of the play, where ambition and deceit disguise evil as good. Shakespeare warns that illusion and hypocrisy can easily corrupt judgment, both in politics and in personal life.

---

👑 5. The Nature of Kingship and Tyranny

Macbeth contrasts the qualities of a legitimate ruler (Duncan and later Malcolm) with those of a tyrant (Macbeth). Duncan rules by justice, mercy, and trust, while Macbeth governs by fear and bloodshed. The disruption of lawful kingship—through regicide—brings chaos to both the natural and moral order.
Shakespeare thus reinforces the divine right of kings, a belief deeply valued by King James I: that rulers are chosen by God and must not be overthrown. Macbeth’s fall becomes a warning against political rebellion and the violation of sacred authority.

---

🔥 6. The Supernatural and the Influence of Evil

The supernatural elements—witches, visions, and ghosts—symbolize the power of evil and the temptation of human weakness. The witches manipulate Macbeth by revealing half-truths, exploiting his ambition. However, they never force him to act; they merely mirror his inner desires.
The supernatural serves as a reflection of the characters’ moral states and the distortion of natural order after Duncan’s murder. Ghosts, blood imagery, and hallucinations all blur the line between reality and nightmare, showing how evil infects the mind as well as the world.

---

⚖️ 7. Order, Disorder, and the Natural World

When Macbeth kills Duncan, the Great Chain of Being—the Elizabethan belief in a divinely ordered universe—is shattered. Nature itself rebels: darkness covers the earth, horses eat each other, and storms rage. These disturbances symbolize the moral and political disorder unleashed by Macbeth’s crime.
The restoration of order at the play’s end—when Malcolm becomes king—reflects Shakespeare’s belief that moral and cosmic balance must be reestablished after chaos and sin.

---

💀 8. Masculinity and Gender Roles

Throughout Macbeth, Shakespeare explores how ambition, violence, and power are tied to ideas of manhood. Lady Macbeth challenges her husband’s masculinity, claiming that to be a man, he must act boldly and without mercy. Yet by following her definition of manhood, Macbeth becomes monstrous rather than heroic.
This theme exposes the destructive nature of rigid gender expectations and suggests that true strength lies in moral courage, not brutality.

 

VI. Literary Approaches to Macbeth

1. Psychoanalytic Approach (Freudian and Jungian)

A psychoanalytic reading of Macbeth explores the inner workings of the characters’ minds, particularly their unconscious desires, fears, and guilt.

• Freudian Analysis: Macbeth’s ambition can be seen as a manifestation of the id—the instinctive drive for power and gratification—while his conscience represents the superego, constantly punishing him through guilt and hallucinations (e.g., the bloody dagger and Banquo’s ghost). Lady Macbeth’s breakdown can be viewed as the repression of guilt that returns in the form of obsession and madness.

• Jungian Analysis: From a Jungian lens, the witches represent the shadow archetype, the dark side of Macbeth’s personality that tempts him to act on suppressed impulses. Lady Macbeth can also be interpreted as Macbeth’s anima—the embodiment of his repressed desire and ambition, externalized in female form.

This approach helps explain the psychological realism of Shakespeare’s characters and their descent into moral and mental chaos.

---

⚔️ 2. Feminist Approach

A feminist reading of Macbeth examines how the play constructs and challenges gender roles. Lady Macbeth defies traditional expectations of femininity by invoking the spirits to “unsex” her and fill her with cruelty. She manipulates Macbeth by questioning his masculinity—“When you durst do it, then you were a man.”
However, the play also punishes her for her transgression: she descends into madness and dies, reinforcing patriarchal ideas about the dangers of female ambition and power. Macbeth’s own concept of manhood is tied to aggression and dominance, revealing the play’s critique of toxic masculinity and the destructive link between gender and violence.
Modern feminist critics, such as Janet Adelman and Carol Neely, argue that Macbeth dramatizes the anxieties surrounding female authority and male identity in Shakespeare’s time.

---

👑 3. Political and Historical Approach (New Historicism)

A New Historicist reading situates Macbeth in the context of Jacobean politics and the reign of King James I. Written around 1606, the play reflects contemporary concerns about treason, regicide, and legitimate kingship. It can be read as a form of political propaganda, supporting James’s belief in the Divine Right of Kings—that monarchs are appointed by God and rebellion against them is a sin.
The witches and supernatural elements also reflect the era’s obsession with witchcraft, which James himself wrote about in Daemonologie (1597). The play’s emphasis on moral order and the chaos following Duncan’s murder mirrors the political anxieties of post-Elizabethan England.

Thus, Macbeth becomes both a moral warning and a political reassurance to a nation concerned about authority, succession, and the consequences of rebellion.

---

💀 4. Moral and Philosophical (Ethical / Christian Tragic Vision)

From a moral-philosophical perspective, Macbeth explores the Christian struggle between good and evil, sin and redemption. Macbeth’s fall results from his violation of moral and divine law—the murder of a divinely appointed king. His torment and despair echo the Christian concept of damnation: once he commits evil, his conscience condemns him to spiritual death.
This interpretation also connects to the Renaissance idea of the Great Chain of Being, which emphasizes that when the natural order is violated, chaos follows. In this light, Macbeth is a morality play warning that ambition and moral corruption lead to eternal punishment and the collapse of order.

---

🔥 5. Marxist Approach

A Marxist analysis focuses on power, hierarchy, and material ambition. Macbeth’s desire for the throne can be seen as a symbol of class mobility and political ambition within a rigid feudal system. His violence becomes a tool of class struggle, disrupting established hierarchies but replacing them with tyranny.
The play also reflects how ideology and power sustain oppression: the divine justification for kingship (the “Great Chain of Being”) legitimizes the rule of elites like Duncan and Malcolm. Macbeth’s downfall, then, serves as a critique of how individual greed and authoritarian power corrupt society and reproduce cycles of violence.

---

🕯️ 6. Structuralist and Symbolic Approach

A structuralist reading examines patterns, oppositions, and recurring symbols in the play. Macbeth operates through a series of binary oppositions:

• Light vs. Darkness

• Order vs. Chaos

• Reality vs. Illusion

• Masculine vs. Feminine

• Fate vs. Free Will
  These opposites structure the play’s meaning and mirror the tension within the characters themselves. Symbols such as blood, sleep, and the weather function as motifs that unify the narrative and express its moral framework. For instance, blood symbolizes both guilt and humanity, while darkness represents ignorance and moral corruption.

---

👁️ 7. Archetypal / Mythological Approach

The archetypal or mythological approach (influenced by Northrop Frye and Carl Jung) views Macbeth as part of a universal pattern of myth and tragedy. Macbeth fits the archetype of the tragic hero—a noble figure destroyed by a fatal flaw (hubris or ambition).
The witches serve as fate figures, echoing the Greek Fates, who guide the hero toward doom. The play’s descent from order to chaos, and eventual restoration, reflects the mythic cycle of death and renewal. The imagery of darkness, blood, and the unnatural evokes primal fears that connect the play to the collective unconscious of human experience.

---

🎭 8. Formalist / New Critical Approach

A New Critical reading focuses on Macbeth as a self-contained work of art, emphasizing imagery, symbolism, and irony rather than historical or biographical context. Critics such as Cleanth Brooks and Robert Penn Warren would highlight the play’s organic unity—how its structure, imagery, and tone reinforce its central paradoxes.
For instance, the recurring imagery of blood, darkness, and sleep creates a cohesive moral and aesthetic framework. The irony of Macbeth’s confidence in the witches’ prophecies (“none of woman born shall harm Macbeth”) underscores Shakespeare’s mastery of dramatic irony and ambiguity.

From this perspective, Macbeth is a perfect example of a tragedy in which form and meaning are inseparable, producing an intense emotional and intellectual effect.

---

🌍 9. Existential and Nihilistic Readings

Modern critics sometimes read Macbeth through an existential lens, emphasizing its vision of human meaninglessness and despair. Macbeth’s “Tomorrow, and tomorrow, and tomorrow” soliloquy (Act V, Scene 5) expresses a nihilistic worldview: life is “a tale told by an idiot, full of sound and fury, signifying nothing.”
This speech can be read as Shakespeare’s profound meditation on the futility of ambition and the emptiness of existence once moral and spiritual order collapse. In this sense, Macbeth anticipates modern existential concerns about choice, responsibility, and the absurdity of human striving.

---

Bibliography

Primary Source

Shakespeare, William. Macbeth. Edited by Stephen Greenblatt, Walter Cohen, Jean E. Howard, and Katherine Eisaman Maus, 3rd ed., W. W. Norton & Company, 2016. The Norton Shakespeare: Tragedies.

---

Secondary Sources – Historical Context and Themes

Bloom, Harold, editor. William Shakespeare’s Macbeth. Chelsea House Publishers, 2010.

Bradley, A. C. Shakespearean Tragedy: Lectures on Hamlet, Othello, King Lear, Macbeth. Macmillan, 1904.

Greenblatt, Stephen. Renaissance Self-Fashioning: From More to Shakespeare. University of Chicago Press, 1980.

Kermode, Frank, and John Hollander, editors. The Oxford Anthology of English Literature: Volume I, Medieval and Renaissance. Oxford University Press, 1973.

Muir, Kenneth. Shakespeare’s Tragic Sequence. Routledge, 1972.

Neill, Michael. “Macbeth.” In The Oxford Shakespeare: Tragedies, edited by Michael Neill and William Shakespeare, Oxford University Press, 2008, pp. 973–1036.

---

Secondary Sources – Literary Theories and Approaches

Barry, Peter. Beginning Theory: An Introduction to Literary and Cultural Theory. 4th ed., Manchester University Press, 2017.

Belsey, Catherine. Critical Practice. 2nd ed., Routledge, 2002.

Freud, Sigmund. “Some Character-Types Met with in Psycho-Analytic Work.” 1916. The Standard Edition of the Complete Psychological Works of Sigmund Freud, vol. 14, translated by James Strachey, Hogarth Press, 1957, pp. 309–333.

Gilbert, Sandra M., and Susan Gubar. The Madwoman in the Attic: The Woman Writer and the Nineteenth-Century Literary Imagination. Yale University Press, 1979.

Greenblatt, Stephen, and Catherine Gallagher. Practicing New Historicism. University of Chicago Press, 2000.

Marx, Karl, and Friedrich Engels. The Communist Manifesto. 1848. Edited by Jeffrey C. Isaac, Yale University Press, 2012.

Nietzsche, Friedrich. The Birth of Tragedy. Translated by Walter Kaufmann, Vintage Books, 1967.

Showalter, Elaine. “Towards a Feminist Poetics.” In The New Feminist Criticism: Essays on Women, Literature, and Theory, edited by Elaine Showalter, Pantheon Books, 1985, pp. 125–143.

Williams, Raymond. Marxism and Literature. Oxford University Press, 1977.

---

Optional Background and Critical Overviews

Bloom, Harold. Shakespeare: The Invention of the Human. Riverhead Books, 1998.

Spivak, Gayatri Chakravorty. A Critique of Postcolonial Reason: Toward a History of the Vanishing Present. Harvard University Press, 1999.

Wilson, John Dover. What Happens in Hamlet. Cambridge University Press, 1935.